It feels like only yesterday when the global elite nearly succeeded in dragging us into their dystopian narrative, all for the sake of a so-called health emergency that was all about about power rather than a pandemic. When these shadow architects of society decide to show their hand, it’s not without the backdrop of a crisis they’ve meticulously staged. Now these architects of control are now in a frantic huddle, trying to stitch together a new tapestry of tyranny. The wake-up call they received was deafening; their illusion of omnipotence over information and dialogue shattered like glass underfoot. They deployed every weapon in their arsenal: digital suppression tools, government-backed social media censorship, and economic blackmail for non-conformists. Yet, truth, like a stubborn dandelion, pushed through the concrete of their control. Their power, it seems, was nothing more than a house of cards, toppled by the breath of reality. Their grand strategy for dominion was the vaccine passport scheme; yet, this was where the alternative media stepped up to the plate, stamping down on the infestation of cockroaches. If such passports had taken root, you wouldn’t dare read these words; your life would hinge on the whim of your digital health status. The populace would live under the shadow of having their economic lifeline severed for a misstep in speech, or worse, face internment in what they chillingly referred to as ‘covid camps’. We’d either be in shackles or in the throes of a fierce uprising.
The year 2020 was their launchpad for a silent coup against mankind. The architects of this new world order were not shy about their intentions. Klaus Schwab and his cronies at the World Economic Forum openly celebrated the virus as their golden opportunity for a “Great Reset” and the dawn of a “Fourth Industrial Revolution.” They heralded the lockdowns as merely the opening act, with plans to tighten the noose further under the guise of environmental salvation. They believed they had secured victory in a bloodless revolution, but reality – like Mike Tyson at his 1986 peak – is a harsh counterpuncher. A vast, unexpected army of the informed and vigilant stood in their way. The lockdowns – AKA house arrests, – have dissolved into memory, the boosters are largely shunned, the vaccination numbers are inflated, and the passport dream has been crushed. This triumph was not by chance but by the unyielding efforts of independent voices that broke through the silicon curtain of Big Tech’s censorship, and the people who read and support blogs like Going Postal. It’s as straightforward as that.
And now an important message from our sponsor…..
Should you feel compelled to aid in the ongoing battle against these forces, I encourage you to think about supporting this cause by becoming a paid subscriber of Going Postal. Thank you.
& now back to the article…
Thank you, SB
Given this setback, one can but surmise that the next engineered crisis will be catastrophic by design, intended to eclipse the previous in both scale & impact. The globalists, having learned from their underestimation of citizen journalism, are likely plotting a more draconian approach to silencing dissent. They’ve made no secret of this intention, with recent conferences and articles boldly discussing strategies to curb free speech. The mask of benevolence is slipping, hinting at an ominous event on the horizon. Before Covid, the globalists elite were using climate alarmism as cover to transforming modern society into a centrally planned and managed dystopia. With Covid revealed as a busted flush, the Great & Good return to their previous narrative & to get a real grasp on their current scheming, one must scrutinize climate conferences with a Puffin’s eye. Last September, a series of “climate summits” unfolded, with the World Economic Forum, in a cozy partnership with the United Nations General Assembly, hosted the Sustainable Development Impact Meeting in New York. Here, the discourse subtly shifted from mere environmental concerns to the broader, more nebulous threats to democracy, and with an almost palpable frustration, they bemoaned the rampant ‘disinformation’ spreading like wildfire across the internet. At this very summit, John Kerry, who has worn many hats including that of a failed presidential hopeful and Brandon’s erstwhile climate emissary, delivered a revelation that should chill the spine of any freedom-loving individual (In or outside of the US). He unabashedly labeled the First Amendment as a “roadblock” to governance, suggesting it was an obstacle in the path of the elite achieving their desired public consensus.
His remarks are nothing short of brazen.
Firstly, the notion of consensus being a virtue is a fallacy. It’s a dangerous myth that strangles the vibrant process of inquiry and debate which defines true scientific endeavor. Science thrives on scepticism and the relentless questioning of accepted norms. Imposing a consensus is tantamount to decreeing dogma, forsaking the very essence of the scientific method. This became starkly evident during the Covid debacle, where a ‘consensus’ was manufactured and peddled, only to be later debunked. The same authorities who endorsed this consensus were the ones advocating for bans on children playing outdoors, all in the name of ‘flattening the sombrero.’ The absurdity of thinking that nature’s playground would be a petri dish for viral spread speaks volumes about the disconnect from actual science. The same goes for the circus of mask mandates, social distancing, and lockdowns/house arrests — none of which were rooted in genuine scientific inquiry but were rather born from a culture of fear and control.
If we delve into the contentious issue of man-made climate change, the idea of scientific consensus is nothing more than a smokescreen. The data, if examined critically, doesn’t hold up. There’s no conclusive evidence linking carbon emissions directly to global warming, nor is there proof that global warming triggers the doomsday scenarios of extreme weather. Furthermore, our current warming trend is not anomalous when placed against the backdrop of Earth’s climatic history. The Washington Post, in an attempt to visually represent Earth’s temperature over 450 million years, inadvertently underscored the point deliberately missed/obscured/ignored by climate “scientists” : The planet has experienced far warmer conditions throughout its geological timeline than we experience today.
Fair dealing/fair use
If advocates for combating climate change were truly earnest in their efforts to mitigate a warmer climate (be it a real issue or not), they would consider practical solutions, rather than levying taxes & extra charges for so-called “emission-free” parcels or plane trips. However, what’s truly at stake is the underlying philosophy articulated by John Kerry – that governance necessitates the curation of information. Kerry’s view reflects a dangerous ‘leetist mindset, where he and his sect believe they have the divine right to sculpt public opinion for what they deem as the ‘greater good.’ This is a role they’ve arrogated to themselves, without the consent of the governed. John attempts to forget that it’s the people who hold the reins, not the other way around. Politicians & their emissaries are mere servants of the public, not its masters. Musings on the sanctity of free speech are irrelevant in the face of constitutional rights. Thus the most insidious misinformation presently being broadcast is not coming from the fringes but directly from those in power, cloaked in the guise of protecting ‘democracy.’ They disseminate falsehoods with impunity. Kerry’s frustration stems from his realisation that the public now has the tools to hold a mirror up to these manipulations. If the survival of what they call ‘democracy’ demands the suppression of speech, then such a system is an affront to the very principles of freedom it claims to uphold.
In his sanctimonious wisdom, Kerry suggests that democracy is “too slow” for the grand societal transformations he deems essential. He casually tosses the First Amendment directly into the rubbish bin, labeling it a “roadblock” to more efficient governance and control. This isn’t just a slip of the tongue; it’s a revelation of his true colours. What he’s really saying is that tyranny would be more effective because it bypasses the pesky nuisance of public consent and the inconvenient reality of propaganda-resistant citizens. His words are not just off-the-cuff remarks; they’re a chilling echo of Klaus Schwab’s own dystopian fantasies during the peak of the pandemic. Kerry isn’t just flirting with authoritarianism; he’s embracing it with open arms, and this should set off bigly alarm bells for us all. This rhetoric aligns disturbingly well with recent propaganda pieces from the establishment media. The New Yorker ponders, with mock innocence, “Is it time to Torch the Constitution ?” while The New York Times muses over the ‘danger’ of the Constitution itself. They even dared to praise the authoritarian overreach in Brazil, where there’s a threat to shut down access to X unless it bends the knee to censorship demands. These are not just questions; they are declarations of war on the very concept of free speech.
When the political ‘leets and their sycophantic journalists begin this assault on free speech, it’s not just a policy debate; it’s preparation for an orchestrated crisis. Free speech isn’t merely an important liberty; it’s the cornerstone of any society that pretends to care about truth. It’s what allows us to sift through the lies, to debate, to dissent, to resist being herded like cattle by those who think they know better. The globalists believed they had cornered the market on information during COVID-19, and when that illusion shattered, they learned a harsh lesson.
Next time, they won’t just try to control the narrative; they’ll aim to obliterate it. They’ll silence the dissenters, the thinkers, the alternative media, and any social platform that dares to foster free thought before they unleash whatever calamity they have planned next. Remember, when they tell you democracy is too slow, what they really mean is your freedom is too cumbersome for their grand designs.
© DJM 2024
