Expect The Unexpected, Part One

Throughout the ballot box’s history, unexpected election results have stunned the public, defied polls, and shifted political landscapes. These surprising outcomes often reflect underlying societal changes, voter sentiment, and the unpredictability of electoral politics. As we approach a UK general election, voters, pollsters and commentators are certain of a Labour win and a Starmer super-majority. But should they be?

Major Surprise

On the night of April 9, 1992, the United Kingdom held a general election that many expected to result in a hung parliament or a narrow victory for the Labour Party. Instead, the Conservative Party, led by Prime Minister John Major, achieved a surprising and decisive win, defying predictions and securing a fourth consecutive term in office.

In the months approaching the election, the Conservatives faced significant challenges. The UK economy struggled with a recession, and widespread discontent surrounded the government’s implementation of the poll tax. Major, who succeeded Margaret Thatcher (dumped by her own Cabinet colleagues in late November 1990), embarked upon a difficult battle against a resurgent Labour led by Neil Kinnock.

Polls leading up to the election showed Labour either with a narrow lead or running neck-and-neck with the Conservatives. The Liberal Democrats, led by Paddy Ashdown, expected to perform well, with the possibility of no single party having an outright majority.

As election night unfolded and results came in, it became clear the Conservatives were outperforming expectations. Early returns from key marginal constituencies revealed the Tories holding onto seats many expected them to lose. This trend continued throughout the night, with Conservative candidates maintaining their strongholds and making gains in unexpected areas.

One of the defining moments came with the declaration in Basildon, a bellwether constituency, showing a Conservative hold. A significant indicator of the broader national trend, this boosted Conservative supporters’ morale while dampening Labour’s hopes.

In the small hours of the morning, the Tories not only defied the odds but secured a clear majority in the House of Commons. They won 336 seats, giving them a majority of 21, with Labour securing 271 seats and the LibDems, 20. This outcome was a major shock to political analysts, many of whom had predicted a much closer race or a potential Labour victory.

John Major’s triumph is attributed to several factors. His personal campaigning style, which included a famous “soapbox” tour where he addressed voters from a makeshift platform, resonated with many. The Conservative campaign also capitalised on voter concerns about Labour’s economic policies, portraying them as risky and likely to lead to higher taxes and instability. In addition, the premature triumphalism of a Kinnock Labour rally in Sheffield made many uneasy.

The unexpected result reaffirmed Major’s leadership and allowed him to continue his premiership, focusing on economic recovery and domestic policy reforms. The 1992 election victory highlighted the unpredictable nature of British politics and demonstrated the Conservatives’ resilience despite facing significant challenges.

John Major’s 1992 election victory remains one of the most surprising and significant in modern British political history. It marked a moment when the Conservatives defied expectations, secured a mandate to govern amidst financial and political uncertainty and exposed the contemporary electoral concept of the Shy Voter.

The term ‘shy voter’ first gained attention in the 1980s and 1990s in the UK and the United States. One of the earliest notable instances being that 1992 UK general election. Analysts suggest some voters might have been hesitant to admit their support for the Conservatives due to the party’s controversial policies or perceived unpopularity at the time.

In the States, the concept of ‘shy Trump voters’ emerged during the 2016 presidential election. Many polls in anticipation of the vote showed Hillary Clinton with a significant lead over Donald Trump, yet Trump won key battleground states and secured the presidency. Some analysts theorised Trump supporters might have been less likely to reveal their voting intentions to pollsters, either due to concerns about a backlash or a general mistrust of the media and establishment.

Why Shy?

The shy voter effect can be attributed to several factors. Social desirability bias, where respondents may give answers they believe are more socially acceptable or mainstream, can lead to inaccuracies in polling. This bias can be pronounced in elections where one candidate or party is perceived as controversial or polarising. Likewise, the anonymity of the voting booth provides a safe space for individuals to vote according to their true beliefs, which may differ from what they express in public or to pollsters.

Polling organisations have attempted to adjust their methodologies to account for potential shy voters, such as using more anonymous or confidential methods or weighting their samples based on demographic factors. Despite these efforts, the accuate capture of the preferences of all voters, particularly those who may be less forthcoming about their views, remains a challenge in political polling.

The idea of the shy voter continues to be relevant in modern elections, where social dynamics, media influence, and political polarisation can shape voter behaviour and perceptions. Understanding this phenomenon is crucial for interpreting data and predicting election outcomes, as it highlights the complexities of measuring public opinion in a diverse and evolving political landscape.

Shy or otherwise, the voters stayed rather than postponed forever the downfall of Major’s government. Given the party’s split between Eurosceptics and Euroenthousiats, a twenty-one majority proved inadequate. Five years later, amongst a plethora of under-achievement and sleaze, Major suffered a historic defeat at the hands of Tony Blair’s New Labour which condemned the Conservatives to thirteen years in opposition.

Sunak’s currency appears to lie lower. From announcing the election date on the steps of Downing Street as a drowned rat, to a betting scandal enveloping those closest to him, everything that can go wrong has gone wrong. But is the Prime Minister, somehow, winning over Shy Voters? We will find out next week while, as things stand, only the most optimistic of Conservatives expect the unexpected.
 

© Always Worth Saying 2024