Violations of Nuremberg Code in Covid-19 Control Program

Part Three

View of the defendants in the dock at the International Military Tribunal trial of war criminals in Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany
Raymond D’Addario, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Introduction By Patrick Barron

In keeping with the medical theme of the following essay by Dr. Nicholas Bednarski and Phil Duffy, their conclusion about damage done by the response by government, the media, and the drug companies to the Covid 19 “pandemic” may be a bitter pill indeed for most Americans to swallow. Since the end of WWII and the revelations of the horrendous Nazi “crimes against humanity”, Americans have assumed that their leaders would never commit such acts. This essay shows that America’s leaders did perpetrate such horrendous crimes, crimes that may even eclipse those of the Nazi leaders due to the worldwide damage they inflicted. This essay is written for serious readers, not for the squeamish. Perpetrators included members of both political parties plus the mainstream and social media. The drug companies colluded with these powerful political people not only to hide dangerous side effects of their drugs but also to lie about the very nature of the drugs. In other words, the rot in America’s elite was deep and pervasive.

Part III

Parts I and II of this series have explored how the Covid-19 Control Program failed to comply with the requirements of items 1 to 5 of the Nuremberg Code.  Part III addresses the remaining Code criteria.

Item 6

Item 6 reads:

The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

Again, no real attempt was made to ascertain the risks taken; the humanitarian importance was judged based on computer models of public health hysteria, violating several pre-existing policies of the World Health Organization, as well as this item of the Nuremberg Code.

Item 7

Item 7 reads:

Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even the remote possibilities of injury disability or death.

No level of government has made any provisions before, during, or after this experiment in worldwide” herd immunity” with an untested genetic treatment.  Our federal government has completely denied the opportunity and ability of the experimental subjects for redress of injury disability or death by protecting the drug companies from any civil or criminal liability for effects of the artificial mRNA vaccines.  No significant effort has been made by the CDC, FDA, or NIH to establish a more robust system of reporting of adverse events or vaccination failures or to follow up those few that are reported by the current inadequate voluntary system.  The one program that may compensate victims of the vaccines is tiny, inefficient, slow, and has approved only a minuscule number of claims for a minuscule sum.


Item 8

Item 8 reads:

The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons.  The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

This rule specifies a highly focused team of health professionals, first limiting its work to a small statistically significant sample of the population.  Only after clear success in the initial experimentation is that circle of scientifically qualified persons and the number of subjects extended.  To the contrary, the Covid 19 vaccine program required from the beginning mass production and distribution of a product its promoters hoped would achieve protection of the world’s population.  Physicians and other health professionals are not scientifically qualified persons except when specifically trained for well-defined clinical studies.  No attempt at studying the effectiveness of the vaccines or their safety upon release was ever intended, designed, or considered.


Item 9

Item 9 reads:

During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he/she has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him/her to be impossible.

Given the legal and social coercion placed on all our population, all nonconsenting uninformed members of the experimental subjects group, the violation of this item of the Nuremberg Code is obvious.

Item 10

Item 10 reads:

During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required by him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

This rule lacks a critical scientific precaution.  Experimental studies frequently are ended early if such harms are seen, or “red flags” of unexpected adverse events are detected by pre-designed vigilance, or if the experiment fails to achieve the pre-designed results.  Here we see multiple issues. No scientist was in charge, unless we accept the bureaucrat Dr. Anthony Fauci’s self-nomination as such, remembering that “he is the Science”.  The dictator of the experiment ultimately was our elected non-scientific chief executive, the President.  Trump started the process and the experiment, but Biden continued enthusiastically with persistent wild claims of effectiveness and safety even after these were seen to be false.  President Biden finally ended the Pandemic Emergency, dropping the experiment’s protocols of lockdowns, masking, social distancing, and forced use of an untested genetic treatment.  He did not base the end of this undesigned, unstudied experiment upon any scientific end points or admissions of failures or harms.  There is no “Institutional Review Board” for this arbitrary and random experiment.  No concrete data has been followed or obtained to indicate any statistically significant outcome, good or bad.  The non-scientific “experimenter” may simply have recognized that the predictable natural history of any viral pandemic had once again shown the predictable natural history that all such viral onslaughts become more infectious and less damaging over time (since they cannot persist by killing off their hosts).  They fade away into always present threats that recur seasonally like influenza, and in the absence of illegal and unethical “gain of function” research are unlikely to become persistent causes of death and disability.  Yet our public health advisors, now masters, continue to insist on repeated booster vaccinations which are almost immediately obsolete due to further mutations of Covid 19.  Scientific judgment by our professional bodies appointed to this responsibility can no longer be trusted.  Their professional judgment has not nor been the driving force of this illegal, unethical, and unjust experiment.  Instead, it is the delusion of the madness of the crowds with Mattias Desmet’s “mass formation” by master propagandists desperate to maintain their version of Plato’s Noble Lie.  They do so despite good emerging evidence strongly suggesting that repeated vaccination with artificial mRNA products results in greater likelihood of subsequent infection with the virus, and more general likelihood of immune suppression, autoimmune disease, and some types of cancers.  They do so despite the ongoing increasing toll of persistent serious adverse events associated with this genetic therapy.

* * *

This discussion affirms that our government and others knowingly and deliberately violated all ten items of the Nuremberg Code, and having done so are liable to accusation of crimes against humanity.  Allegations are not charges, and there is no venue to judge these crimes other than widening expression of public opinion, the letter boxes of Mainstream Media and elected representatives, and the ballot box.  Our administrative and state scientific communities are largely beyond our reach, and perhaps even that of Congress.  Our only adequate response may be a personal one, based on the intent of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.  Our resistance on behalf of personal freedom must be based on personal action.  The more “authorities” insist on the absolute correctness of their point of view, the more skeptical you become.  Look for other credible sources of factual information beyond Mainstream Media and those governmental authorities.  Ask your healthcare provider if they know the Nuremberg Code and its more modern equivalent, the Helsinki Declaration.  When any “new” treatment is recommended, ask your healthcare provider the key questions of the Nuremberg Code and insist on full direct answers:

What is the known natural history of my condition/problem?

What are the specific benefits to me from this treatment, at what cost?

Has this treatment been fully studied for effectiveness and safety in animals and humans?

Has it been fully approved by the FDA under standard, not accelerated, processes, and not as an “Emergency Use Authorization”?

What are all the known side effects of the treatment, and what adverse events have been reported?

What are the alternative treatments available or under consideration, with their costs, side effects, and adverse events?

What might happen, at what probability, if I choose NOT to accept this or any therapy?

What might happen if I decide at some point to stop this treatment?

Relative Evil versus the Scope of Human Experimentation

When comparing the crimes committed by the Nazi doctors versus the actions of authorities and health officials who promoted the Covid-19 vaccine program, it is easy to fall into the trap of attempting to measure relative evil.  It is pointless to attempt to persuade others that the Covid-19 vaccine program was more or less evil than the activities of the Nazi doctors.  We can, however, come to some useful conclusions about the scope of both programs.  The Nazi doctors targeted two populations – (1) their own nationals who they believed were socially useless, and (2) nationals among the conquered nations.  Although promoted by individual governments, the scope of the Covid-19 vaccine program targeted a world population, and particularly skeptics of the program. There are questions of ex post facto law, unconstitutional in the United States, being used in the sentencing of the top Nazis and the Nazi doctors.  That is troubling by itself, but one wonders why this gap in statutory law was not closed 76 years ago. Instead of privileging special interests (the drug companies), shouldn’t these legislators have found a way to write criminal penalties into our law for violations of the Nuremberg Code?  Would Fauci and his followers in public health have signed up so quickly for the Covid-19 program if they were aware they could spend the rest of their lives in jail?  And what about Donald Trump who led the Covid-19 charge, and Joe Biden who continued its confabulatory course?


That politicians should become involved in such schemes as mandated vaccines and vaccine passports should not surprise us.  There is a special dimension to the Covid-19 vaccine program that should be recognized, however, the participation of the medical establishment.  The world population was terrorized into believing that Covid-19 represented an unprecedented threat to life, that it was well beyond the normal strains of viruses for which many of us are voluntarily vaccinated annually. Governmental and medical authority played a major role in the program’s acceptance, yet a small minority questioned the Covid-19 vaccination program.  They were ostracized by society, government, and media, and even accused of using their bodies to harm and kill their fellow humans.

Historically the medical profession has recognized no authority above medical science and truth, but this time was different.  This time the medical profession accepted the direction of federal governmental authority.  Our Constitution reserves supervisory authority to the States.  How could this happen?

Part of the answer lies in a fuller understanding of the phenomena of the Nazi era.  Germans of that time were civilized and yet they had become conditioned to accepting authority.  Instead of protesting when their Jewish neighbors were seized in apartments down the hall, the typical German pretended they were ignorant of the heinous crimes that were unfolding around them.  But there were also other Germans who risked their lives to protect Jews.  Clearly the Nazi era was a demonstration of the evil that a population will tolerate during the madness of crowds, but it was also a demonstration of the sanity that exists in a minority during that madness.

Without a medical education, lay persons will find it difficult to determine which medical studies about the Covid-19 vaccine are true to science, and which are not.  In the final analysis, the Covid-19 Control Program injustice must be determined within the medical community because of its specialized knowledge.  But that community has been exposed to an immense amount of political propaganda and pressure. However, the intent of the Nuremberg Code should be understandable to all.  Instead of heeding pharmaceutical company ads, “Ask your doctor if XYZ is right for you”, ask if the physician is familiar with the Nuremberg Code.  Better yet, bring a copy of the code to your next visit.  Only by your advocacy can the medical community get back to its standard of pursuing truth.

  1. Nicholas E. Bednarski, M.D. is a physician with forty years clinical experience in Internal Medicine, Nephrology, and Critical Care Medicine. Residency and fellowship was at LAC-USC Medical Center and UCLA, with Chief Residency in Medicine at Wadsworth VA Medical Center.  During his career he has achieved four Board certifications as well as teaching interns and resident physicians.  He has practiced in several cities in mainly civilian hospitals but also USAF Scott Medical Center.  In retirement he maintains his medical licensure and actively follows the scientific literature on controversial subjects in medicine and public affairs.  His writing can be found on Substack as “A Jaundiced Eye”.
  2. Phil Duffy, an instructor of the Constitution, is a weekly contributor to WFYL’s We the People – The Constitution Matters.  His book, A Tale of Four Cities(soon to be published), contains a chapter on the Nazi era.

By (1)Nicholas Bednarski, M.D. with (2)Phil Duffy

© Patrick Barron 2023 Website