Muslims have been disunited ever since the Sunni-Shia succession fight in the 7th century. Weakened by division, Muslims have been ruled by Turks, British, French, ‘Merica, and now Israel. Post 1918, the British and French combined to create the boundaries of the Middle East Arab countries so that the countries contained both Sunni and Shia, thereby ensuring division that made foreign rule easier. Muslim disunity has thus made it easy for Washington during the first quarter of the 21st century to go to war against Muslims in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and now Iran, in order to free for Greater Israel the land from the Nile to Pakistan. The governments of these Arab countries, blinded by disunity over a succession fight 14 centuries ago, were unable to unite in common defence and were destroyed one by one. And if Iran falls, Turkey will be next. Indeed, Turkey set itself up by assisting America overthrow Syria. On 17 February 2026, former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett, speaking at the Conference of Presidents of American Jewish Organizations, declared: “A new Turkish threat is emerging. Turkey is the new Iran.” He launched the demonisation of Turkey, warning that President Erdoğan is “sophisticated, dangerous, and… seeks to encircle Israel.” We will soon be hearing this from the Israeli-American MIGA movement. It won’t be long before FoxNoos talking heads are wringing their hands over the “Turkish threat.”
Iran is Persian, not Arab, and shows determination like the Taliban. And, just as Washington failed against the Taliban, Washington might well fail against Iran. It really depends on how strong is the Iranian national consciousness. But if Iran does prevail, the Israeli-Washington failure might free the United States of domination by Israel of its foreign and domestic policies. It is indeed a strange situation. America could again become a sovereign country only if Iran triumphs over the Israeli-American attack. Americans should therefore be cheering for Iran if they wish to again be a sovereign country instead of one whose President and MIGA movement are manifestly Israeli puppets.
Iran sees itself as being betrayed both by Putin and Xi. Both have indicated by their actions that they value relations with deceptive Washington more than they value their Iranian ally. The entire world sees this, and thus Moscow and Beijing have lost all prospect of world leadership. Two craven governments sit out a fight in which their own vital interests are at stake. It is difficult to imagine the stupidity of the Russian and Chinese governments, both of which have apparently convinced Washington of their aversion to confrontation, thereby inviting provocation. The Donald has promised to turn Iran into Gaza if Iran doesn’t accept regime change and a puppet ruler but has destroyed the MAGA movement, turning it into the MIGA movement and taking America to another war in the Middle East on behalf of the agenda of Greater Israel.
Using the disguise of a “war on terror,” the United States has spent the first quarter of the 21st Century using American & its Allies blood and money to destroy countries that were barriers to Greater Israel, a territory that encompasses the Muslim Middle East from the Nile to Pakistan. Iraq, Libya and Syria are no longer functioning Arab states. Trump and Netanyahu believed that Iran would fall as easily as the others, but that has proved not to be the case. Indeed, it appears that by not losing, Iran is winning. Expecting a quick and easy victory, Trump and Netanyahu went to war without sufficient missiles to continue in the combat. One consequence is the destruction of American radar and military bases in the Persian Gulf. Another is the inability of Israel to intercept incoming Iranian missiles, an inability that will perhaps intensify as Iran works its way through its older stock of missiles and post current ceasefire begins using it’s modern hypersonic ballistic missiles. It is more than possible that Israel could end up looking like Gaza. According to news reports, one of the Persian Gulf oil city-states that hosts US military bases has requested that the United States depart as US presence no longer provides protection. Possibly the other hosts of American bases will make the same request, in which case the result of Trump’s war for Israel will be the removal of Washington’s presence in the Middle East and a defeat of Washington’s long-term agenda of controlling oil flows from the Persian Gulf.
Trump and Netanyahu seem to have put themselves into a cul de sac. Both face elections this year, elections unlikely to go well if they are preceived to be losing their war. Chatter from Washington internets would indicate that landing troops on Kharg Island is a consideration back on the table – surely a suicide mission. In other words, Trump doesn’t know what to do. Netanyahu does know what to do – Nuke Iran, in order to save Israel. Aware of this possibility Iran might hold back from victory and go for a settlement in which Washington and Israel agree to normalise relations with the Iranian nation. Such a settlement would not last, because it is incompatible with the carved in stone agenda of Greater Israel. Therefore, during the time for which such a settlement might last, Iran would have to develop and deploy nuclear weapons, knowing that otherwise Iran will be struck by Israeli nukes.
So…………the outcome of Trump and Israel’s war could easily be nuclear proliferation and a reduction of Israeli and American power in the Middle East. This could be a good thing as both Israelis and Americans would understand that the agenda of Greater Israel has consequences too severe to be justifiable. If the Iranian government holds firm and learns from the experience, there could be a silver lining in Trump and Israel’s war. The expansionist agenda would be exposed as too costly and would have to be abandoned both by Israel and Washington. The weak-willed governments in Moscow and Beijing would see that it is possible, after all, to stand up to Israeli-dominated Washington, and possibly might start standing up to Washington themselves instead of selling out their Allies. If so, this would produce the multi-polar world that Putin talks so much about but negates the possibly of with his own craven behavior. Perhaps XI would understand that it is better to have a determined military, such as the one he just purged, than a moderate one that encourages, as Putin does, ever more serious provocations in refusing to acknowledge them as acts of war. The future of the world depends on whether leaders can re-enter the world of reality or stay lost in a more comforting unreality in which they presently operate……………
© DJM 2026
